Normal view MARC view ISBD view

51P DNA damage ATR/Chk1 checkpoint signalling increases PD-L1 immune checkpoint activation and its implication for personalised combination therapy

In Annals of oncology
By: Kumar N.
Contributor(s): Yadav P | Kumar A | Beniwal S | Kapoor A | Kalwar A.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2018Description: .Subject(s): Signal transduction | Combined modality therapy | DNA damage | Cell cycle checkpoint | Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 In: Annals of oncology Vol.29, no. Suppl_6, mdy315.001Summary: Background: DNA double-strand break (DSB) is the most critical type of genotoxic stress. Clinical studies have revealed a link between genomic instability and response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in cancer management. We investigated role of DBS repair and ATR/Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint in regulating PD-L1 expression and their use in therapy selection and study design. Methods: Protein expression data proteins and phosphoproteins with major clinical outcome endpoints were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas project. A statistical correlation analysis was performed between the expression and distribution DBS repair and ATR/Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint pathway and PD-L1. Signaling network was also analysed for of therapeutic target identification. Results: The expression and distribution patterns of PD-L1 was measured in 7694 samples from 32 cancer type. Increased expression of PD-L1 was associated with higher tumor stage and grade. Analyses of the DNA damage ATR/Chk1 checkpoint signalling revealed strong correlation of PDL1 expression. PD-L1 expression in was upregulated in response to DSBs with strong correlation with MRE11 (correlation coefficient (r) =0.39, p < 0.01), RAD51 (r = 0.33, p < 0.01). This upregulation requires ATM/ATR/Chk1 kinases (Chk2_pt68; r = 0.36, p < 0.01 and Chk1_ps296; r = 0.33, p < 0.01). Interestingly Jab-1 expression was corelated with both Chk-1(r = 0.27, p < 0.01) and PD-L1 (r = 0.22, p < 0.01). We further investigate for the possible signaling mechanism for the correlation and found activation of oncogenic signaling in a cancer type specific manner. PI3K/AKT/mTOR/S6K, INFgamma/ JAK/STAT/IRF1 and Ras/BRAF/MEK/ERK were involved in mechanism of increased PD-L1 expression. Conclusions: DSB-mediated immune activation is balanced by concomitant inhibitory signaling, via the checkpoint kinases ATM, ATR, and Chk1 drived PD-L1 expression in tumors. These observations have important clinical implications for therapy selection, particularly following progression on DNA damaging agents suggesting that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may be a useful therapeutic strategy (with or without concurrent DNA damaging agents) for tumors.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Add tag(s)
Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Tata Memorial Hospital
Available AR19254

Abstract published in the Book of Molecular Analysis for Personalised Therapy (MAP) 2018 14–15 September, Paris, France

Background: DNA double-strand break (DSB) is the most critical type of genotoxic stress. Clinical studies have revealed a link between genomic instability and response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in cancer management. We investigated role of DBS repair and ATR/Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint in regulating PD-L1 expression and their use in therapy selection and study design.

Methods: Protein expression data proteins and phosphoproteins with major clinical outcome endpoints were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas project. A statistical correlation analysis was performed between the expression and distribution DBS repair and ATR/Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint pathway and PD-L1. Signaling network was also analysed for of therapeutic target identification.

Results: The expression and distribution patterns of PD-L1 was measured in 7694 samples from 32 cancer type. Increased expression of PD-L1 was associated with higher tumor stage and grade. Analyses of the DNA damage ATR/Chk1 checkpoint signalling revealed strong correlation of PDL1 expression. PD-L1 expression in was upregulated in response to DSBs with strong correlation with MRE11 (correlation coefficient (r) =0.39, p < 0.01), RAD51 (r = 0.33, p < 0.01). This upregulation requires ATM/ATR/Chk1 kinases (Chk2_pt68; r = 0.36, p < 0.01 and Chk1_ps296; r = 0.33, p < 0.01). Interestingly Jab-1 expression was corelated with both Chk-1(r = 0.27, p < 0.01) and PD-L1 (r = 0.22, p < 0.01). We further investigate for the possible signaling mechanism for the correlation and found activation of oncogenic signaling in a cancer type specific manner. PI3K/AKT/mTOR/S6K, INFgamma/ JAK/STAT/IRF1 and Ras/BRAF/MEK/ERK were involved in mechanism of increased PD-L1 expression.

Conclusions: DSB-mediated immune activation is balanced by concomitant inhibitory signaling, via the checkpoint kinases ATM, ATR, and Chk1 drived PD-L1 expression in tumors. These observations have important clinical implications for therapy selection, particularly following progression on DNA damaging agents suggesting that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may be a useful therapeutic strategy (with or without concurrent DNA damaging agents) for tumors.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha